IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Millions rely on emergency pandemic benefits for rent, food, and medicine. Now, that lifeline has disappeared.

A $600 per week lifeline is about to run out of rope, threatening to leave millions of American families at the end of theirs.
Image: Residents affected by economic fallout from the pandemic hold groceries provided by the Houston Food Bank in Texas
Residents who have been affected by the economic fallout caused by the coronavirus pandemic, hold groceries distributed by the Houston Food Bank in Houston, Texas on July 18, 2020.Adrees Latif / Reuters

A $600 per week lifeline is about to run out of rope, threatening to leave millions of American families at the end of theirs.

The pandemic unemployment assistance payments, which were approved in March as part of the government's fiscal stimulus package, known as the CARES Act, are set to expire July 31. For administrative reasons, states have said the last payments will go out this weekend if the program isn't extended. Lawmakers are currently debating whether to extend the benefit, with some arguing that the size of the payments eliminates the incentive to work. Others say the benefit has been an economic lifeline for millions who lost their jobs because of the pandemic.

Sarah is a single mother from rural Texas, who asked for her last name to be withheld so her children aren’t embarrassed by others knowing they rely on government assistance. Earlier this year, she left her job in a densely packed call center when the employer and coworkers refused to follow standard guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on masks and social distancing, she told NBC News.

“When it became evident that it would be ‘business as usual’ at the call center and many of the management team were convinced it was all a hoax or being exaggerated, I left,” Sarah said. Since then, one of her former colleagues has tested positive.

“As badly as I need to go back to work after the extra $600 stops, I won't risk my family,” Sarah told NBC News.

Now she’s struggling to put food on the table and make rent, and doesn’t know how she’ll manage when the funds for the emergency federal program extra assistance runs out. The local food bank only gives out small bags of bakery items, not enough to feed four children ranging in age from elementary to high school.

This month the Texas Health and Human Services Commission revoked her SNAP food benefits after she made $3 above the income limit, because her ex-husband had suddenly paid backdated alimony.

When Sarah contacted the agency, she got conflicting advice and was told it could take over two months to resolve her issue. After being contacted by NBC News, an agency spokesperson said they reviewed her case and found she had exceeded federally established income limits for SNAP but they've now reached out to her to let her know she will be eligible again in August.

The government benefits programs have “failed the most vulnerable of us all, the working class American family,” Sarah said.

According to an analysis by The Century Foundation, an estimated 25 million Americans have benefited from the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation. The program provides additional emergency income on top of an employee’s regular unemployment benefits — which states set at around 50 percent of a person's previous income.

The program has been criticized for being overly generous to some workers for giving them more money than they made before the pandemic. But technical restrictions in the historically underfunded state unemployment infrastructure mandated a one-size-fits-all approach in order to deliver assistance as quickly and as widely as possible.

Many of the state’s antiquated unemployment systems, some programmed in the obsolete programming language of COBOL, couldn’t handle fine-tuning payments based on a percentage replacement for lost wages, said Chad Stone, chief economist for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning research and advocacy institute.

That necessitated a flat rate that would work as income replacement to meet the needs for the greatest number of workers, and their ability to keep paying their bills and purchasing.

A compensation of $600 was designed to make up the difference between the $980 average weekly earnings of employees on private payrolls in March and the $380 average amount of weekly unemployment insurance benefits.

There is consensus in Washington that federal unemployment assistance needs to be continued, but there are differences over how it should be structured. With Congress now on summer recess, it may be weeks before any payments resume, and state unemployment offices — especially those with the oldest systems — will still require time to reprogram their computers.

The need for continuation of the $600 was further highlighted on Thursday, after the Labor Department reported that more than 1.43 million workers filed new claims for state unemployment benefits last week. It's the second time in almost four months that weekly unemployment claims have risen, and marks the 19th-straight week that more than 1 million Americans have sought unemployment aid.

Tabitha Griffin, a single mother in Florida, had to shut down the cleaning business she owned when the pandemic hit. For now, she lives in a reduced-rate hotel room along with her 7-year-old daughter. If she can't afford that, they will have to sleep in her car, she told NBC News.

She has applied for federal pandemic unemployment assistance benefits, but accidentally entered one of her bank account digits wrong. She fixed it and has pleaded with the Department of Economic Opportunity, the state unemployment agency, to reissue her pay, to no avail.

When her backpay comes through, she says she will have enough to find a long-term rental.

Her attempts to contact the agency went nowhere. After being contacted by NBC News, the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity said it would look into the matter. But days later, she still hadn't heard from the agency.

“To have a child and feel like you're failing them is the worst thing I’ve ever felt,” Griffin said.

The situation is especially critical for some unemployed workers who have been relying on the federal assistance to cover their ongoing out-of-pocket medical expenses.

Amy Leyendecker is a 46-year-old with Type 1 diabetes living in New Mexico. She needs daily doses of insulin to avoid going into a life-threatening coma. In 2018, she lost a foot to amputation after trying to ration her insulin to stretch it out. With a note from her doctor, she went on unemployment in March from her part-time cashier job after her employers encouraged anyone to do so who didn’t feel safe working through the pandemic. Since then, the $600 per week has enabled her to cover her monthly medical costs.

“We don't know how long this will go on, so I don't know month to month if I will be able to afford to live. This month, I am good unlike many many others. Next month? I guess we will see,” Leyendecker said.